Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing

Niagara project, FERC project no. 2216-066, New York.

Publisher: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower Licensing in Washington, DC (888 First Street, NE, Washington, 20426)

Written in English
Published: Downloads: 550
Share This

Subjects:

  • Hydroelectric power plants -- Environmental aspects -- Niagara River (N.Y. and Ont.),
  • Hydroelectric power plants -- Environmental aspects -- New York,
  • Environmental impact statements -- Niagara River (N.Y. and Ont.),
  • Environmental impact statements -- New York

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references.

StatementFederal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower Licensing.
ContributionsUnited States. Division of Hydropower Licensing.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsTD195.E4 F56 2006
The Physical Object
Pagination1 v. (various pagings) :
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL23141762M
LC Control Number2007361307

but their analysis is beyond the scope of this book. While the Upper North Fork Feather River relicensing process is ongoing nearly „ years after PG&E sub-mitted its initial application to FERC in, opportunities for achieving some of the long-requested mitigations to hydropower impacts on Maidu becameAuthor: Beth Rose Middleton Manning.   This final stretch, about 10 miles from the river’s confluence with its larger relative, is one of the West’s spectacular waterways, with bright water flowing below steep red-rock cliffs. But the view will change dramatically if a Phoenix-based company builds a proposed hydropower project.   Rick Chase, NYPA executive director for hydropower relicensing, said the authority's entire proposed settlement for all stakeholders in both counties has a nominal value of $1 billion, which. issued a final environmental statement related to the operating license for WBN Units 1 and 2 (NUREG, “Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Units Nos. 1 and 2,” December , FES-OL) for operating Units 1 and 2 at the WBN site (the final environmental statement [FES] is an EIS equivalent).

economic modeling of relicensing and decommissioning options for the klamath basin hydroelectric project prepared for: consultant reportcalifornia energy commission in cooperation with:u.s. department of the interior prepared by: november cec   The BPA markets hydropower produced at federal dams on both rivers. At the congressional hearing, Simpson intimated he doesn’t think highly of the draft environmental impact statement. “Any plan we come up with, any EIS, had better recover salmon. Now we’ve got a new plan out there, I can’t remember, the flexible spill thing.   FERC itself estimated in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on relicensing that even if fully FERC relicensed, the required retrofitting would be so expensive that these dams would then operate at more than a $20 million/year net loss . The Online Books Page. Online Books by. United States Army Corps of Engineers (United States. Army. Corps of Engineers) A Wikipedia article about this author is available.. United States. Army. Corps of Engineers: Preliminary Report Concerning Explorations and Surveys, Principally in Nevada and Arizona () (page images at MOA) United States.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Final Environmental Impact Statement for Relicensing of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project No. Issued Nov. 16, Final Environmental Impact Statement for Relicensing of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project No. , Executive Summary. Issued Nov. 16,   For 30 years, activists have been working to remove two dams and restore salmon runs on Washington's Elwha River, and now the goal is in sight - if the money comes through from Congress.   Sabine-Neches Basin and Bay Expert Science Team (Sabine-Neches BBEST), Environmental flows recommendations report. Final report to Sabine and Neches Rivers and Sabine Lake Bay and Basin and Bay Area Stakeholder Committee, Environmental Flows Advisory Group, and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, pp. Google ScholarCited by: 9. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part , the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Bucks Creek Hydropower Project (FERC No. ) and has prepared a draft environmental impact statement (EIS.

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing Download PDF EPUB FB2

Final environmental impact statement for hydropower relicensing Box Canyon Hydroelectric Project, FERC project no, Washington and Idaho.

Published: () Draft environmental impact statement Swan Falls Hydroelectric Project, Idaho: FERC Project No. / Published: (). Get this from a library. Final environmental impact statement for relicensing six hydroelectric projects in the Flambeau River Basin: FERC project nos., Upper, Lower, Pixley, Crowley, Big Falls, and Thornapple hydroelectric.

Get this from a library. Final environmental impact statement for relicensing six existing hydroelectric projects in the Peshtigo River Basin: FERC project nos.

Caldron Falls ;Sandstone Rapids ;High Falls ;Potato Rapids ;Johnson Falls ;Peshtigo. [United States. Office of Hydropower Licensing.]. Final environmental impact statement for hydropower licensing [microform]: St.

Lawrence-FDR Power Project, FERC project no. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Hydropower--Environment and Engineering ; N.Y. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Washington, D.C. ( First St., NE, Washington. Final environmental impact statement for hydropower licensing [microform]: Soda Project (FERC Project no.

); Grace-Cove Project (FERC Project no. ); Oneida Project (FERC Project no. ) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of Energy Projects, Division of Engineering and Environmental Review Washington, DC ( First.

Start Preamble. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR partthe Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Bucks Creek Hydropower Project (FERC No.

) and has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the project. Analysis, Design and construction, Environmental conditions, Environmental impact statements, Fishways, Hydroelectric power plants, Power utilization, Spillways, Vortex-motion Places Columbia River, Rocky Reach Reservoir Region, Rocky Reach Reservoir Region (Wash.), Washington.

preparing the Exhibit E (Environmental Report) of a license application or intend to prepare and submit an environmental document as part of their application. The Commission staff typically prepares an environmental assessment (EA) to support licensing decisions.

An File Size: KB. The role of ecosystem valuation in environmental decision making: Hydropower relicensing and dam removal on the Elwha River Article (PDF Available) in Ecological Economics 56(4) Final environmental impact statement for hydropower license: Catawba-Wateree hydroelectric project--FERC project no.North Carolina and South Carolina E F «Previous.

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Loup River Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. Nebraska Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing First Street, NE Washington, D.C. June FERC PDF (Unofficial) 07/05/File Size: 4MB.

Final environmental impact statement}, author = {}, abstractNote = {This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) has been prepared for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) to consider modifications to the existing Lower Mokelumne River Project (LMRP) (FERC Project No.

) in California. Chinook salmon and steelhead. The Commission is required to prepare an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement for any action that may have a significant effect on the human environment.

Excluded from this requirement are rules that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural, or that do not substantially change the effect of legislation or the. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Partthe Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Bucks Creek Hydropower Project (FERC No.

) and has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS. Hydropower policy in the United States includes all the laws, rules, regulations, programs and agencies that govern the national hydroelectric industry. Federal policy concerning waterpower developed over considerable time before the advent of electricity, and at times, has changed considerably, as water uses, available scientific technologies and considerations developed to the present day.

The Pit River is a major river draining from northeastern California into the state's Central Valley. The Pit, the Klamath and the Columbia are the only three rivers in the U.S.

that cross the Cascade Range. The longest tributary of the Sacramento River, it contributes as much as eighty percent of their combined water volume into the Shasta Lake reservoir; the junction of their Shasta Lake Country: United States.

formal adoption of the rules) (see Table 1). 4 The Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Assessment (EIS/EA) and license order for each case were obtained from FERC records. FERCFinal Environmental Impact Statement for Moosehead Proj et al.

in Kennebec River Basin, ME Office of Hydropower Relicensing, Washington, DC () July 28Cited by: Channel Maintenance in Hydropower Relicensing Channel Maintenance Considerations in Hydropower Relicensing J.P.

Potyondy, E.D. Andrews ROS Book: USFS: PCWA-Lpdf: Final Environmental Impact Statement Stanislaus River Project. Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement In CASE E - Proceeding on Motion of the Commission to Implement a Large-Scale Renewable Program and a Clean Energy Standard.

CASE M – Proceeding on Motion of the Commission in Regard to Reforming the Energy Vision. CASE M – Proceeding on Motion of the. @article{osti_, title = {Application procedures for hydropower licenses, exemptions, and preliminary permits}, author = {Not Available}, abstractNote = {This document provides essential information regarding the FERC's regulations and procedures for filing an application with the Commission for hydropower licenses, exemptions and preliminary permits.

In November of this year, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers released a new Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 14 major dams on the Coosa, Tallapoosa and Alabama rivers as part of the. FERC itself estimated in its Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) on relicensing that even if fully FERC relicensed, the required retrofitting would be so expensive that these dams would then operate at more than a $20 million/year net loss (see FERC FEIS, Table on pg.

The November FERC Final EIS is available online at. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) () Final Environmental Impact Statement Licensing Three Hydroelectric Projects in the Lower Penobscot River Basin, FERC Project Nos. andWashington Google ScholarCited by: 4.

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE UPPER NORTH FORK FEATHER RIVER PROJECT SP-F15, Task 4. Oroville Facilities Relicensing, FERC Project No. January. CDWR. SP-F2 Evaluation of Project Effects on Fish Disease. Oroville Facilities Environmental assessment for hydropower.

The Foothills Water Network (FWN or the Network) and its member organizations respectfully offer the following comments and recommendations on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the relicensing of Projectthe Yuba River Development Project (hereinafter the “project” or “YRDP”) operated by the Yuba County Water Agency.

Application for New License Middle Fork American River Project (FERC Project No. ) February CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS The regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act define a (NEPA) cumulative effect as “the impact on.

FERC: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for relicensing of the Klamath Hydroelectric Project No. posted to KBC 9/26/06 *** FERC Final Environmental Impact St atement for relicensing Klamath Dams 11/16/ The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mobile District held its Black History Observance Luncheon Feb.

20 at the USACE Readiness Support Center in downtown Mobile. This year’s theme was “Honoring the Past, Securing the Future,” providing another opportunity to celebrate diversity in the District.

Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit No. Georgia Power Company. Docket No.NUREG, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Washington, D.C. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants. NUREG. Finding of no significant impact and final supplemental environmental assessment to the Folsom Dam safety and flood damage reduction final environmental impact statement/environmental impact report / (Sacramento, Calif.: U.S.

Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mid-Pacific Region, ), by Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.1. Introduction. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Implementing Regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) call the analysis of alternatives “the heart of the environmental impact statement” (40 CFR Part ), and several key NEPA guidebooks, legal treatises, and research reports have emphasized the central importance of alternatives analysis to the NEPA Cited by:   21 NYISO Gold Book (estimate) vs.

NYISO Gold Book (actual). 22 NYISO Gold Book (medium estimate) versus NYISO Gold Book (actual) 23 Power TrendsNYISO. 24 “ Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,” PSC case no. E, pageBase Case. 25 Power TrendsNYISO.